Samsung Electronics (005930.KS) — AI Equity Research | April 2026

This analysis was produced by an AI financial research system. All data is sourced exclusively from publicly available filings, earnings transcripts, government data, and free financial aggregators — no proprietary data, paid research, or institutional tools are used. Every figure cited can be independently verified by the reader using the sources listed at the end of this report. The AI system does not hold opinions, make investment recommendations, or have financial interests of any kind. This report presents a structured summary of public financial data. It does not constitute investment advice and should not be the basis for any investment decision. A human editorial team reviews all published output for factual accuracy before publication.

This report is independent analytical research produced for informational and educational purposes only. It is not the product of a FINRA-registered broker-dealer, does not constitute investment advice, and should not be the sole basis for any investment decision. All intrinsic value estimates represent mathematical outputs of explicitly stated model assumptions derived from publicly available data only — they are not price predictions, price targets, or investment recommendations. This analysis is meant to inform your thinking, not replace your own due diligence. Consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Company Profile

Key Statistics Block

This analysis is built entirely from publicly accessible financial data. Every figure cited is independently verifiable by the reader using the sources listed at the end of this report.

Section 1 — Analytical Perspective & Central Tension

Samsung Electronics is priced for a moderate, cyclical recovery — but the Q1 2026 preliminary filing shows operating profit of ₩57.2 trillion for a single quarter, already exceeding the company’s entire FY2025 operating profit of ₩43.6 trillion, a magnitude of earnings acceleration that the trailing P/E of ~29.6x does not yet reflect.⁹⁵

Consensus View

The prevailing market narrative frames Samsung’s 2025 as a transition year — from a company that lost HBM market share to SK Hynix during 2024–2025 to one staging a comeback via HBM4 qualification and conventional DRAM price recovery. Consensus expected modest sequential improvement. The forward P/E of ~8.4x embedded in current street estimates implies the market treats Samsung’s earnings surge as highly cyclical and likely to normalize. The broad analyst price target average of ₩239,873 KRW — against the current price of ₩196,500 — suggests a consensus that meaningful upside exists but that a peak earnings multiple contraction is already being discounted.¹

Market-Implied Growth Rate

At the current trailing P/E of approximately 29.6x, and with the stock having risen over 215% in the 52-week period from its ₩52,900 low, the market is implying extraordinary earnings normalization relative to what the filed data is now showing.⁴ Specifically: the forward P/E of ~8.4x based on consensus FY2026 estimates implies revenue approaching ₩450–500 trillion KRW and operating margins significantly above FY2025’s 13.1% — yet the Q1 2026 preliminary guidance of ₩57.2 trillion in operating profit on ₩133 trillion in revenue implies an operating margin of approximately 43%, which, if sustained for even two quarters, would produce a full-year figure the market has not yet fully repriced.⁹

Data-Based Counterpoint

The data produces a specific counterpoint to consensus cyclicality pricing. The Q1 2026 preliminary operating profit of ₩57.2 trillion is approximately 131% of Samsung’s entire 2025 annual operating profit of ₩43.6 trillion — achieved in a single quarter.⁹⁵ The DS (Device Solutions / semiconductor) division generated a Q4 2025 quarterly operating profit of ₩16.4 trillion alone on revenue of ₩44.0 trillion, with DRAM average selling prices rising more than 30% sequentially and NAND prices rising approximately 20% in the same quarter.¹⁰ Samsung has confirmed HBM4 sample delivery to NVIDIA for qualification testing and targets HBM shipments to triple in 2026 vs. 2025.¹¹ If even 50% of Q1 2026’s operating profit run-rate is sustainable in subsequent quarters — itself a conservative assumption given the structural demand environment — the implied full-year 2026 operating profit would far exceed street estimates of ₩80–100 trillion.

Macro Context

The Bank of Korea held its policy rate steady at 2.50% through February 2026, with the forward guidance dot plot showing no further cuts expected through mid-2026, reflecting currency stability concerns, household debt management, and ongoing energy price pressures tied to the Iran conflict.¹² The South Korea 10-year government bond yield has climbed to approximately 3.65–3.72%, reflecting both domestic fiscal concerns and global rate pressure.¹³ The US Federal Funds Rate stands at 3.50%–3.75%, with the Fed holding steady at its March 2026 meeting; the 10-year US Treasury yield is approximately 4.33%.¹⁴¹⁵ For Samsung, macro rate pressure is secondary — the dominant macro variable is AI infrastructure capex by global hyperscalers, which is driving demand for DRAM, HBM, and NAND at a rate that industry analysts describe as structurally supply-constrained through at least 2027. The US-Iran conflict has introduced an oil price dimension (higher energy costs for fab operations), but South Korea holds ample energy reserves and Samsung’s financial position — a net cash pile of ₩100.6 trillion — provides a substantial buffer.⁴

Historical Context Frame

Samsung’s trailing P/E of ~29.6x sits at approximately 138% above its 10-year median P/E of 12.33x, reflecting that the market is assigning a premium to what it perceives as a structural — not merely cyclical — earnings inflection.³ However, the 10-year peak P/E reached 38.5x, suggesting the current multiple is not yet at historical extremes. Capex intensity peaked at ₩53.7 trillion in FY2024 and declined marginally to ₩52.7 trillion in FY2025, indicating disciplined investment relative to the revenue acceleration; the capex-to-revenue ratio compressed from approximately 18.5% in 2024 to approximately 15.8% in 2025 as revenue grew faster than capital deployment.⁸ During the 2022 semiconductor downturn, Samsung’s P/E compressed to 8.9x and operating profit collapsed — the current recovery constitutes the sharpest reversal in the company’s post-2020 history.

Analytical Logic Chain

Section 2 — Fundamental Deep Dive

Revenue by Segment — Trailing Four Quarters (FY2025, KRW Trillion)

Full-year revenue of ₩333.6 trillion represented a 10.9% increase over FY2024, driven overwhelmingly by the second-half DS acceleration. The Q4 2025 DS operating profit of ₩16.4 trillion alone exceeded the entire Q1–Q3 DS operating profit combined, illustrating the extreme back-weighting of the earnings recovery.¹⁹

Gross and EBITDA Margin Trend

SK Hynix delivered Q4 2025 operating margin of 58.4% in its memory business. TSMC guided Q4 2025 gross margin at ~60%. Samsung’s consolidated operating margin of 21.4% in Q4 2025 reflects its more diversified structure (consumer electronics and display businesses dilute the blended margin versus pure-play memory peers), not an intrinsic disadvantage in the memory segment where Samsung’s memory-specific margins are estimated in the 63–67% gross margin range.²⁰

Net Income vs. Cash Flow from Operations — Earnings Quality

The divergence between net income and operating cash flow is materially positive — cash flow from operations substantially exceeds net income, which is the expected pattern for a capital-intensive semiconductor company with significant depreciation. This is a benign accounting explanation (depreciation and amortization on the large asset base), not an earnings quality concern. FCF of ₩36.5 trillion versus operating profit of ₩43.6 trillion reflects that capex of ₩52.7 trillion is substantially absorbed by strong operating cash generation.⁷⁸ Earnings quality is assessed as strong based on this relationship.

Guidance Revision History

The pattern of sustained, accelerating beats versus consensus is material. The Q1 2026 beat margin of 36–40% over LSEG’s weighted consensus represents the largest single-quarter consensus miss in recent Samsung history. The data suggests analyst models have consistently underestimated the pace of DRAM/HBM ASP increases and Samsung’s operating leverage to those increases.

Peer Comparison

Samsung’s trailing P/E premium to Micron reflects market pricing for scale and diversification, while the discount to TSMC reflects TSMC’s pure-play foundry moat and Samsung’s execution risk in foundry. Samsung’s consolidated operating margin is depressed relative to memory-only peers because it absorbs underperforming consumer electronics and VD/DA businesses.

Historical Valuation

The current trailing multiple of ~29.6x sits near the upper bound of Samsung’s historical range, but the forward multiple of ~8.4x — based on FY2026 consensus earnings estimates that the Q1 2026 preliminary results suggest are materially understated — may itself be subject to rapid upward revision. A ₩57.2 trillion Q1 in isolation would annualize to ~₩229 trillion in full-year operating profit, roughly 2–3x street estimates of ₩80–100 trillion, though it is premature and analytically improper to annualize a single preliminary quarter without the detailed breakdown (scheduled April 30, 2026).

Net Debt/EBITDA: Samsung carries a net cash position of ₩100.6 trillion — it has no net debt.⁴ Balance sheet health is unambiguously strong. FCF quality is strong; the company converts operational earnings to cash at a high rate given its asset-heavy structure. ROIC stands at 12.12% on a trailing basis and is accelerating sharply.⁴

Section 3 — Capital Allocation & Governance Assessment

Capital Allocation

FY2025 capex totaled ₩52.7 trillion, with ₩47.5 trillion directed to the DS semiconductor division and ₩2.8 trillion to Samsung Display.⁸ The Memory Business received the bulk of DS allocation, directed toward HBM production capacity expansion and advanced node transition. FCF of ₩36.5 trillion supported a formal shareholder return policy: 50% of FCF (₩18.3 trillion) forms the basis for distributions, comprising the announced regular dividend and buybacks.⁷ In FY2025, ₩6.6 trillion of shares acquired in the buyback program were canceled to implement the return policy.⁷ An additional special dividend of ₩1.3 trillion was declared in Q4 2025 to qualify under South Korea’s new high-dividend company taxation scheme.²²

Return on Invested Capital Assessment: ROIC of 12.12% on a trailing basis is modestly above the cost of capital (estimated WACC of approximately 8–10% using the South Korean risk-free rate — discussed in Section 6).⁴ Given the trajectory — ROIC was depressed through 2024 as capex ran far ahead of earnings — the improving trend is material. If Q1 2026’s operating profit rate is even partially sustained, ROIC is on track to expand significantly above WACC. The evidence currently supports a characterization of capital deployment as showing early-but-credible signs of generating returns above cost of capital, driven primarily by the AI semiconductor demand environment rather than operational transformation alone.

Samsung has formally established a dedicated M&A team within its new Business Support Office, following Chairman Lee Jae-yong’s acquittal in longstanding legal proceedings.²³ Potential large-scale M&A activity is signaled but no specific targets have been filed or announced. This represents an unquantified option that could shift capital allocation materially.

Governance Review

Samsung’s board comprises 4 executive directors and 6 independent directors, with independent directors forming the majority.²⁴ The company operates on a one-share-one-vote principle with no preferential share classes.²⁴ Chairman Lee Jae-yong was not included among board nominees in February 2025 due to ongoing legal considerations; following his subsequent acquittal, his formal return to the board remains a governance development to monitor.²⁴²³ No material related-party transaction flags emerged from the publicly available data beyond the customary cross-shareholding arrangements within the Samsung Group ecosystem, which are longstanding and disclosed.

Insider & Ownership Activity

Free float is approximately 84% — above the 10% threshold — so the standard insider protocol applies. The dominant ownership activity in the past six months involves the Lee family’s inheritance tax obligations. Hong Ra-hee (widow of late Chairman Lee Kun-hee) placed 10 million Samsung Electronics shares in trust with Shinhan Bank for gradual disposal by April 30, 2026, with Lee Boo-jin and Lee Seo-hyun contributing additional tranches.²⁵ This supply represents approximately 17.72 million shares entering the market via a managed trust — not distressed family selling, but a structured compliance mechanism for South Korea’s inheritance tax on the late chairman’s estate. Following these disposals, Lee Jae-yong (1.65%) becomes Samsung’s largest individual shareholder.²⁵

Major institutional shareholders as of mid-2025: Samsung Life Insurance (7.62%), National Pension Service of Korea (6.48%), BlackRock (4.99%), Samsung C&T (4.47%), Vanguard (3.35%).²⁴ Foreign investors collectively hold approximately 49.99% of issued shares.²⁴

No director share purchases in the open market were publicly identified in the available filings — the activity is one-directional (inheritance-driven selling from the family side). This is analytically consistent with a governance structure managed for stability rather than sending a buy signal through insider purchase activity.

Earnings Call vs. Filing Cross-Check

The Q4 2025 earnings call (January 29, 2026) was consistent with the filed preliminary results. Management stated that the DS division set all-time highs in quarterly revenue and operating profit driven by HBM expansion. The call’s discussion of HBM4 delivery timelines, targeting “reestablishing leadership” in HBM, is a forward-looking framing that the financial statements appropriately do not yet support — HBM4 mass production and its revenue contribution are not yet reflected in any filed figure. This analysis flags this as an important disclosure asymmetry: management’s verbal confidence in HBM4 leadership is aspirational, while the filed HBM market share data (Samsung at ~17% in mid-2025) reflects a position that requires substantial execution to achieve the claimed outcome.¹⁶¹⁹ No material divergence was found between management’s factual description of Q4 results and the disclosed numbers.

Section 4 — Technical Context

Samsung Electronics (005930.KS) has staged one of the most dramatic price recoveries on the Korea Exchange in the trailing 52 weeks, rising from a low of ₩52,900 to a high of ₩223,000 — a move of approximately 321% — before pulling back to ₩196,500 as of April 7, 2026.¹

Current Trend Structure: The stock is in a confirmed uptrend on all major timeframes, having broken out from a prolonged base that formed during the 2023–2024 semiconductor earnings trough. The stock traded in the ₩52,900–₩84,200 range as recently as late 2025 before accelerating sharply into 2026 on earnings momentum.¹²³

Key Support and Resistance Levels:

• Support: ₩165,000–₩170,000 (prior breakout consolidation zone); ₩120,800 (moving average support referenced by aggregator data)
• Resistance: ₩223,000 (52-week high; all-time high per TradingView)⁴⁵
• Near-term resistance: ₩200,000–₩205,000 (psychological level; intraday high April 7, 2026 was ₩202,500)¹

RSI (14-day): Approximately 70.7, placing the stock at the upper boundary of the neutral zone and approaching technically overbought territory.²⁶ Historically, Samsung’s RSI reaching above 70 has preceded short-term consolidations, though during strong fundamental inflections (2021 rally; the current cycle), RSI has sustained above 70 for extended periods.

MACD (12,26,9): The MACD reading of approximately 164.86 indicates a strongly positive reading with signal line above the trigger, consistent with an active momentum phase.²⁶ The histogram direction is positive.

Pattern Classification: Base Breakout transitioning toward extended momentum phase. The Q1 2026 preliminary results released April 7, 2026, triggered intraday price action consistent with a fresh catalyst re-rating. The stock gapped up on the day from ₩193,100 to ₩202,500 before settling at ₩196,500.¹

Technical context describes price behavior only — not a recommendation. To verify independently: open TradingView (tradingview.com) or Yahoo Finance (finance.yahoo.com), search 005930.KS, set chart to 12-month daily view, apply RSI period 14 and MACD 12,26,9.

Section 5 — Risk Factors

Risk 1: HBM Market Share Recovery — Execution Risk The core bull thesis is contingent on Samsung successfully qualifying and mass-producing HBM4 for NVIDIA’s Rubin GPU platform and other hyperscale customers. As of the most recent publicly available data, Samsung’s HBM share had fallen to approximately 17% in Q2 2025, versus SK Hynix at 62% and Micron at 21%.¹⁶ Samsung has delivered paid final HBM4 samples to NVIDIA.²⁷ However, yield ramp, performance qualification, and contract finalization remain pending. If Samsung fails to secure leading HBM4 supply agreements, or if quality issues persist, the DS division’s projected 2026 operating profit contribution — which Macquarie estimates at “90% of OP” for the full year — would be materially impaired.¹¹ The magnitude of this risk: a 10-percentage-point shortfall in HBM market share versus expectations could reduce 2026 DS operating profit by an estimated ₩15–25 trillion based on the current HBM ASP environment, representing a 15–25% reduction in total OP versus base case.

Risk 2: AI Capex Cycle Reversal or Demand Softening The entire earnings acceleration thesis rests on hyperscaler AI infrastructure spending remaining robust. DRAM ASPs rose 30% sequentially in Q4 2025 and NAND 20%.¹⁰ These are historically extreme quarterly moves. If AI model development encounters technical plateaus, regulatory restrictions, or enterprise adoption disappointment — or if hyperscalers reduce capex budgets — memory price declines could be rapid and severe. The memory industry has historically demonstrated cycle compression of 30–50% in ASPs within 3–6 quarters of a demand deceleration. A reversion to mid-2025 ASP levels would reduce Samsung’s 2026 operating profit trajectory by an estimated 40–60%.

Risk 3: Geopolitical and Supply Chain Disruption South Korea imports approximately 70% of its crude oil from the Middle East.¹² The US-Iran conflict has already impacted energy prices and introduced supply chain uncertainty. Elevated energy costs raise Samsung’s fab operating expenses. Additionally, US-China trade tensions affect Samsung’s Chinese NAND flash supply (Samsung operates significant NAND capacity in Xi’an, China); US export restrictions on advanced memory chips to China remain an active regulatory risk. Samsung’s Chinese revenue exposure and NAND production in China represent a material but unquantified risk factor. Current pricing does not appear to fully reflect this geopolitical complexity given the rapid share price appreciation.

Section 6 — Intrinsic Value Estimate

DCF Calculation Table

DCF Sensitivity Table

Operating Leverage Sensitivity Statement: A 500-basis-point compression in operating margin (e.g., from a projected ~35% to ~30% for the DS division in a price-down scenario), holding all other assumptions constant, reduces the base case intrinsic value estimate by approximately 18–22%.

Relative Multiples Calculation Table

Bull / Base / Bear Scenario Table

Quantified Risk/Reward Observation: The probability-weighted intrinsic value estimate of approximately ₩247,000 KRW represents a premium of approximately 26% to the current market price of ₩196,500 KRW. This is a mathematical observation derived from the model assumptions stated above — it is not a recommendation.

Analyst consensus: Analyst price targets currently range between ₩110,000 and ₩340,000 KRW, with an average near ₩239,873 KRW, based on the full analyst coverage set tracked by Investing.com as of April 7, 2026.¹ Korea Investment & Securities has recently raised its target to ₩330,000, citing projected 2026 operating profit above ₩300 trillion.²⁸ Morgan Stanley held a target of ₩170,000 (January 2026) based on a 6.2x FY2026 P/E — a figure that appears stale given the Q1 2026 preliminary data.²⁹

Conclusion — Business Health Assessment

Samsung Electronics enters Q2 2026 having disclosed Q1 2026 operating profit of ₩57.2 trillion — a single-quarter figure that exceeds the entire FY2025 total operating profit. The DS division’s leverage to AI infrastructure spending is the primary driver, contingent on HBM4 qualification success and sustained memory pricing. The balance sheet carries no net debt and ₩100.6 trillion in net cash, providing extraordinary resilience against cyclical reversals. The critical variable the data does not yet resolve is whether Samsung’s HBM4 volumes with NVIDIA and other major customers are sufficient to sustain the Q1 2026 earnings trajectory — full segmental detail is expected April 30, 2026.

Next Quarter Watchlist

Key Metrics to Monitor

Editorial Commitment

This analysis will not be revised retroactively. If subsequent data materially changes the analytical picture, an updated report will be published with a clear changelog. The metrics listed above are the specific conditions under which an updated analysis would be warranted, stated in advance of the outcome.

Analysis Snapshot

Analysis published: April 7, 2026 | Ticker: 005930.KS | Exchange: Korea Exchange (KRX) | Price at publication: ₩196,500 KRW | Overall Business Health: Strong | Probability-Weighted Intrinsic Value Estimate: ~₩247,000 KRW | Next scheduled review: April 7, 2027

Sources & Disclosures

¹ Investing.com referencing KRX real-time data — Samsung Electronics (005930) Live Price & Statistics — April 7, 2026 — https://www.investing.com/equities/samsung-electronics-co-ltd

² companiesmarketcap.com referencing KRX market data — Samsung Market Capitalization — April 2026 — https://companiesmarketcap.com/samsung/marketcap/

³ GuruFocus / Finbox / Investing.com referencing KRX filings — Samsung Electronics PE Ratio Historical Data — March–April 2026 — https://www.gurufocus.com/term/pettm/XKRX:005930 and https://finbox.com/KOSE:A005930/explorer/pe_ltm/

⁴ Stock Analysis referencing Samsung Electronics consolidated financial statements — KRX:005930 Statistics & Valuation — April 2026 — https://stockanalysis.com/quote/krx/005930/statistics/

⁵ Samsung Global Newsroom — Samsung Electronics Announces Fourth Quarter and FY 2025 Results — January 29, 2026 — https://news.samsung.com/global/samsung-electronics-announces-fourth-quarter-and-fy-2025-results

⁶ Xinhua / Samsung Global Newsroom referencing Samsung FY2025 results — Roundup: Samsung Electronics’ revenue hits record high in 2025 — January 29, 2026 — https://english.news.cn/20260129/fc9467f336714b3fbae6e899d4574b92/c.html

⁷ Quartr.com referencing Samsung Q4 2025 earnings call transcript — Samsung Electronics Investor Relations Summary — January 29, 2026 — https://quartr.com/companies/samsung-electronics-co-ltd_4754

⁸ Investing.com — Samsung Electronics Reports 2025 Capital Expenditure of KRW 52.7 Trillion — January 29, 2026 — https://www.investing.com/news/company-news/samsung-electronics-reports-2025-capital-expenditure-of-krw-527-trillion-93CH-4472051

⁹ Samsung Global Newsroom — Samsung Electronics Announces Earnings Guidance for First Quarter 2026 — April 7, 2026 — https://news.samsung.com/global/samsung-electronics-announces-earnings-guidance-for-first-quarter-2026

¹⁰ Alpha Sense / Yahoo Finance referencing Samsung Q4 2025 earnings call — SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. R (SSU.F) Q4 FY2025 Earnings Call Transcript — January 29, 2026 — https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/SSU.F/earnings/SSU.F-Q4-2025-earnings_call-405206.html

¹¹ Investing.com — Samsung Electronics Earnings Preview: The Return of the Memory King — January 8, 2026 — https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/samsung-electronics-earnings-preview-the-return-of-the-memory-king-4435611

¹² Trading Economics / Bank of Korea — South Korea Interest Rate — February 26, 2026 — https://tradingeconomics.com/south-korea/interest-rate

¹³ Trading Economics / FocusEconomics — South Korea 10-Year Government Bond Yield — Most recent data approximately 3.65–3.72%, March–April 2026 — https://tradingeconomics.com/south-korea/government-bond-yield

¹⁴ Trading Economics / Federal Reserve — United States Fed Funds Interest Rate 3.50%–3.75% — April 2026 — https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/interest-rate

¹⁵ CNBC / Advisor Perspectives — US 10-Year Treasury Yield approximately 4.33% — April 3–7, 2026 — https://www.cnbc.com/quotes/US10Y

¹⁶ Tweaktown / Counterpoint Research referencing Q2 2025 HBM market share data — SK Hynix Beats Samsung as World’s Biggest Memory Chip Supplier — August 4, 2025 — https://www.tweaktown.com/news/106807/sk-hynix-beats-samsung-as-the-worlds-biggest-memory-chip-supplier-for-first-time-ever/index.html

¹⁷ TradingKey — SK Hynix Q4 2025 Operating Margin Analysis — February 11, 2026 — https://www.tradingkey.com/analysis/stocks/us-stocks/261577980-skhynix-hbm4-samsung-nvda-micron-mu-tradingkey

¹⁸ Samsung Global Newsroom referencing Q3 2025 results presentation — SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS Earnings Presentation: 3Q 2025 Financial Results — October 2025 — https://images.samsung.com/is/content/samsung/assets/global/ir/docs/2025_3Q_conference_eng.pdf

¹⁹ Samsung Global Newsroom — Q4 2025 earnings detail from FY 2025 results release — January 29, 2026 — https://news.samsung.com/global/samsung-electronics-announces-fourth-quarter-and-fy-2025-results

²⁰ SmBom / TrendForce referencing Korea Economic Daily — Samsung and SK Hynix Memory Margins — December 23–24, 2025 — https://www.smbom.com/news/46152

²¹ QZ.com referencing LSEG SmartEstimate — Samsung Q1 2026 Record Profit Forecast on AI Chip Demand — April 7, 2026 — https://qz.com/samsung-record-q1-2026-profit-forecast-ai-chips-040726

²² Alpha Sense referencing Samsung Q4 2025 earnings call — Samsung Electronics Q4 2025 Earnings Analysis — January 29, 2026 — https://www.alpha-sense.com/earnings/005930.kr

²³ The Korea Herald — Samsung Forms M&A Unit, Raising Anticipation for Lee’s Next Moves — November 16, 2025 — https://www.koreaherald.com/article/10616947

²⁴ MatrixBCG / PortersFiveForce referencing Samsung governance disclosures — Who Owns Samsung Electronics Company? — 2025 — https://matrixbcg.com/blogs/owners/samsung

²⁵ KED Global — Samsung Heirs Sell $1.3B Stake in Samsung Electronics for Inheritance Taxes — November 2, 2025 — https://www.kedglobal.com/samsung-group/newsView/ked202510310009

²⁶ Investing.com — Samsung Electronics (005930) Technical Analysis — April 7, 2026 — https://www.investing.com/equities/samsung-electronics-co-ltd-technical

²⁷ TrendForce — Samsung Reportedly Plans 50% HBM Capacity Surge in 2026, Spotlight on HBM4 — December 30, 2025 — https://www.trendforce.com/news/2025/12/30/news-samsung-reportedly-plans-50-hbm-capacity-surge-in-2026-spotlight-on-hbm4

²⁸ Meyka.com referencing Korea Investment & Securities analyst report — 005930.KS Stock Today: April 6 — Target Hiked as Profit Seen >KRW300T — April 6, 2026 — https://meyka.com/blog/005930ks-stock-today-april-6-target-hiked-as-profit-seen-krw300t-0604/

²⁹ Investing.com — Samsung Electronics Price Target Raised to KRW 170,000 by Morgan Stanley — January 8, 2026 — https://www.investing.com/news/analyst-ratings/samsung-electronics-price-target-raised-to-krw-170000-by-morgan-stanley-93CH-4436832

Adblock test (Why?)