Post Views: 36

This first post of May 9 (shown below) was soon halted by X.com administrators with no explanation provided.

I appealed the halting of my post yet soon thereafter the message was seen: “Appeal declined.” Past occurrences of censorship at X.com has been documented in previous articles. An Email message informed me: “We have carefully reviewed your appeal request regarding the following post, and concluded to uphold our initial decision . . . If you have any questions, contact our X Ads Support team at https://ads.x.com/en/help.”

Curiously, on the previous day my promotional post another recent article was halted. I appealed and later received the Email message: “Your ad has been approved and is now visible to your target audience.”

Based upon my perusing “For you” posts at X.com, my conclusion about high interest news taking place in relation to the UFO files release and the Jeffrey Epstein files release is that the algorithm is regulated to allow an avalanche of relevant posts to be distributed only during the first day of a high interest newsmaking event. My dissatisfaction with “For you” posts in general is that there are lengthy interludes when few substantial ‘hard news’-oriented posts are viewed and instead are seen numerous posts with trivial (such as pets, entertainment media and celebrities) or sensationalistic in relation to murders and other crimes, physical altercations, accidents, and so on.

One topic of posts I’ve found is Elon Musk asking “Where are the aliens?” As for President Trump, he seemed somewhat knowledgeable when he specified ‘people coming from space’ during an October 2024 interview by Joe Rogan.

Trump: I’ll tell you what a lot of people are interested in the people coming from space, you know.

Rogan: Yes.

T: And I know you’re interested in that.

R: Oh very interested in that. How much did they tell you about that?

T: A lot.

R: Really.

T: Yeah.

R: What did they tell you?

T: (no immediate reaction) . . .

R: How much can you tell?

T: So I . . .

I decided to create a new post, this time not mentioning the www.war.gov/UFO website. The post began circulating on May 11 and has continued unhalted until the early morning hours of May 16. The latest notification received was that peterclaridge1 in the UK had reposted my post at around 4 / 5 a.m Pacific time. When I checked to see the status of this promotional post, I saw what is shown below.

Again, questions of information regulation and even promotional posts censorship are raised by this development. Ironically, since May 8 I’ve been replying to UFOlogy-related posts with posts providing a link to the UFOs / UAP / Space People / UFOlogy Index of Linked Evidentiary Articles. These are 50 X Profiles who received one of these posts:

disclosure org, JeremyCorbell, UAPJames, LiberationTimes, MichaelSalla, MarioNawfal, jamescfox, YourAnonOne, Truthpole, chrisramsey52, GalileoProject1, Cortex_Zero, theblackvault, UAPJames, disclosureorg, ageofdisclosure, JeremyCorbell, I_D_Official, MiddleOfMayhem, OMApproach, HighPeaks77, goodmorningufo, LegacyProgramVP, Eyes_OnTheSkies, mrjeffknox, @AliensOnEarth_, RedPandaKoala, PostDisclosure, TheUfoJoe, UAPWatchers, UAPDr, UAPReportingCnt, TST___Radio, UFOB@UFOB_, disclosurefound, jordanflowers, SETIInstitute, RepEricBurlison, elonmusk, ChrisCuomo, japantimes, theurigeller, mattgaetz, RepLuna, DNIGabbard, CIADirector, StevenBartlett, NEWSMAX, TheAtlantic, @PapiTrumpo

Shortly before 2 p.m. that same day (May 16), a reposting notification indicated that the promotional post was once again in circulation at X. I’m left wondering what happened. Did someone choose to “Report post”? At X.com readers may report any post and select one of these reasons:

Spam
Hate, Abuse, or Harassment
Child Safety
Violent Speech
Graphic or Violent Media
Illegal and Regulated Behaviors
Impersonation
Adult Sexual Content
Private or Non-Consensual Content
Suicide or Self-Harm
Terrorism or Violent Extremism
Civic Integrity

Perhaps a denialistic person identifying as a ‘skeptic’ or even a jealous UFOlogy commentator choose to report my post.

Some of the responses to my posts confirm my realization that people are so indoctrinated by mainstream media that they don’t allow themselves to read in the entirety articles at this blog and consider or reflect about evidence when it is presented after being either ignored or suppressed for many decades. For someone who thinks that himself or herself ‘knows’ something that in actuality is an erroneous conclusion, it seems that data being offered them presenting information conflicting with their ideology is only relevant for consideration if someone representing ‘official’ media—perhaps some television newscaster or government official—is enunciating what conclusions may be drawn.

In the past X.com has seemed a far less regulated news source than mainstream corporate news websites yet I’ve previously chronicled that there is calculated regulation of “For you” posts. A perfect example is this blogger’s own posts—the numerous unpromoted ones—that blatantly
have never been distributed to people other than my subscribers (as far as I know based upon the lack of a substantial total of views).